Plan alternative investments around capital calls

Learning goals

• Evaluate economic exposures, suitability and monitoring of alternatives.
• Build a liquidity plan instead of relying on smoothed correlations.

Draft · approximately 90 minutes, excluding further revision.

Decision case · fictional facts

A fictional endowment has 100 million assets, 25 million private NAV, 15 million unfunded commitments and 8 million annual spending. Liquid assets equal 75 million before a stress in which their value falls 20%; capital calls of 10 million arrive while expected distributions of 6 million fail to arrive.

Classify the risks behind the label

Alternatives may provide distinct cash-flow, inflation, credit, equity or insurance-like exposures. They are not interchangeable diversifiers or bond substitutes. Appraisal smoothing and stale prices can understate measured volatility and correlation; leverage and common growth sensitivity can reappear in crises. A factor view complements asset-class labels.

Assess lock-ups, redemption gates, fees, valuation practices, governance, tax status, expertise and the ability to sustain commitments. Mean–variance inputs alone can miss nonlinear losses and unavailable exits. Compare scenario/factor and cash-flow approaches, including the investor’s financial and operational capacity.

Commitment pacing is a funding policy

Model calls, distributions, spending and collateral jointly. Unfunded commitments are not current NAV but create future obligations. Private allocations can rise mechanically when public assets fall, the denominator effect, even with unchanged private marks. Pacing should reflect vintages, strategy concentration and stressed funding rather than forcing a static percentage each quarter.

Monitor realized cash, valuation bridges, fees, team changes, covenants, counterparty exposure and sustainability of the funding plan. Secondary sales or borrowing can help but may be costly or unavailable exactly when needed. Document escalation thresholds and avoid treating internal marks as cash.

Choose alternatives by downside behavior and funding ability

Against a long equity position, high-quality duration can hedge a growth shock but lose with equities in an inflation shock. Alternatives vary: buyouts retain equity/leverage risk, private credit retains default risk and trend strategies depend on implementation. Evaluate common factors and nonlinear tails rather than declaring every alternative a safer bond substitute.

Opportunity sets can be organized by asset class or by growth, inflation, duration and liquidity factors. Allocation methods include mean–variance with corrected risk estimates, scenario/factor budgets and cash-flow pacing. Suitability requires expertise, fee/valuation governance, lock-up capacity, tax status and ability to meet calls while distributions are delayed. A high stated return is insufficient if the investor cannot sustain the funding path.

Monitor commitment schedules, realized distributions, valuation bridges, leverage, team changes, concentrations and covenant problems. Report both current NAV and uncalled obligations. Escalate stale marks or liquidity shortfalls, and evaluate costly secondary sales or borrowing as contingent options rather than assuming reliable exits in stress.

Trace the denominator effect through a capital call

Continue the original endowment stress: public liquid assets have fallen to 60 m, private NAV is 25 m, a 10 m call is funded immediately and 8 m of spending follows. Assume the call adds exactly 10 m to NAV with no fee or valuation loss. Distinguish a transfer between asset categories from consumption. Then apply a 15% write-down to the post-call private NAV.

The committee proposes treating uncalled commitments as assets and expected distributions as certain liquidity. Explain why both treatments would distort this balance sheet. Identify which contractual facts could change the calculation: recallable distributions, recycling provisions, fees and payment timing.

Model reasoning, sensitivity and self-check

Immediately after the call, liquid assets are 50 m and private NAV 35 m; total assets remain 85 m. The call itself is not a 10 m investment loss. After spending, liquid assets are 42 m and total assets 77 m. Private weight = 35/77 = 45.4545%, not the earlier pre-call 29.4118%. Financing an existing commitment can sharply raise measured illiquidity even when no new commitment is signed.

The 15% write-down reduces private NAV to 29.75 m; total assets become 71.75 m and private weight 29.75/71.75 = 41.4634%. The lower reported weight does not replenish cash: liquid assets remain 42 m. A falling illiquid weight can accompany economic loss rather than improved payment capacity.

Self-check: reconcile liquid assets, private NAV and total assets at each stage. State that this simplified case assumes called capital enters NAV at par and spending is paid from the liquid book. In practice, reconcile fund notices and valuation dates rather than automatically adding every call to NAV at face value.

Formula and assumptions

Private weight=private NAV/(private NAV+public value); liquidity=available assets−calls−spending

Errors to catch

• Using private NAV to pay a near-term capital call.
• Reading low reported correlation as stable economic diversification.

Write, compare, then self-assess

Your writing stays in this page’s memory and is lost on reload. Export includes self-assessment totals only.

Original knowledge check

Answer every question before checking. Review explanations after submitting; retry starts a new attempt.

Sources and coverage status

These original lessons are drafts. Public outlines are used to check scope; the official learning-outcome text and proprietary question banks are not reproduced here. Follow the source for exam-year requirements and updates.

• Reference · www.cfainstitute.org